SLYV vs. MDYV
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while MDYV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.18%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for MDYV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
SLYV vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than MDYV's 9.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 10.18% annualized return and MDYV not far ahead at 10.40%.
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
MDYV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
SLYV vs. MDYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 9.04% | 7.45% | 11.48% | 15.35% | -7.19% | 30.51% | 3.68% | 25.89% | -11.95% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and MDYV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SLYV and MDYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYV vs. MDYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
MDYV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
MDYV
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
MDYV
Industrials
SLYV
MDYV
Technology
SLYV
MDYV
Real Estate
SLYV
MDYV
Energy
SLYV
MDYV
Healthcare
SLYV
MDYV
Basic Materials
SLYV
MDYV
Communication Services
SLYV
MDYV
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
MDYV
Utilities
SLYV
MDYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. MDYV — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
MDYV
SLYV vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYV | MDYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 1.97 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 6.78 | +6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYV | MDYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.37 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.39 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.41 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum MDYV drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and MDYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | MDYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -60.71% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -10.53% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -22.58% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -22.58% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -45.90% | -1.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.38% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -8.62% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 3.06% | -0.23% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) at 3.93%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | MDYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 3.93% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 10.56% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 15.25% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 19.50% | +2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 21.90% | +2.06% |
SLYV vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SLYV and MDYV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than MDYV's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.31% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SLYV and MDYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs MDYV's -60.71%.
On 10-year performance, MDYV leads with 10.40% vs 10.18% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDYV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV and MDYV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.73% for MDYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while MDYV is Mid Cap Value Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and MDYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer