SLYV vs. MDYG
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while MDYG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.65%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for MDYG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
SLYV vs. MDYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SLYV having a 19.47% return and MDYG slightly lower at 18.87%. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has underperformed MDYG with an annualized return of 10.65%, while MDYG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 41.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
MDYG
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 31.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
SLYV vs. MDYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 19.47% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 18.87% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and MDYG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SLYV and MDYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. MDYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
MDYG
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
MDYG
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
MDYG
Technology
SLYV
MDYG
Industrials
SLYV
MDYG
Real Estate
SLYV
MDYG
Healthcare
SLYV
MDYG
Energy
SLYV
MDYG
Basic Materials
SLYV
MDYG
Communication Services
SLYV
MDYG
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
MDYG
Utilities
SLYV
MDYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. MDYG — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
MDYG
SLYV vs. MDYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 2.98 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 11.86 | +2.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. MDYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum MDYG drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and MDYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -58.44% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.91% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -25.45% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -29.26% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -39.27% | -8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.48% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -8.02% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.49% | +0.33% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. MDYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.81%, while SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 6.17% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 13.87% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 17.59% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 20.70% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 21.09% | +2.87% |
SLYV vs. MDYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SLYV and MDYG have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. MDYG - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than MDYG's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and MDYG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDYG has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to SLYV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs MDYG's -58.44%.
On 10-year performance, MDYG leads with 11.74% vs 10.65% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDYG has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV and MDYG have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.61% for MDYG.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while MDYG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and MDYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer