MDYG vs. IVOV
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV).
MDYG and IVOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. IVOV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both MDYG and IVOV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDYG or IVOV.
Correlation
The correlation between MDYG and IVOV is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MDYG vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MDYG:
1.10
IVOV:
0.80
MDYG:
1.60
IVOV:
1.20
MDYG:
1.19
IVOV:
1.15
MDYG:
1.74
IVOV:
1.48
MDYG:
5.63
IVOV:
4.06
MDYG:
3.24%
IVOV:
3.15%
MDYG:
16.54%
IVOV:
16.05%
MDYG:
-59.09%
IVOV:
-45.99%
MDYG:
-7.62%
IVOV:
-7.87%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYG achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 10.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has outperformed IVOV with an annualized return of 9.73%, while IVOV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.89% annualized return.
MDYG
16.59%
-3.11%
4.23%
16.66%
10.03%
9.73%
IVOV
10.94%
-3.34%
10.94%
11.33%
9.93%
8.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDYG vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MDYG and IVOV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDYG vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDYG vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while IVOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 1.19% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.48% | 1.60% | 0.82% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 0.00% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.36% | 1.66% | 1.47% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
MDYG vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and IVOV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDYG vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.