MDYG vs. IVOV
MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) and IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IVOV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYG returned 12.05%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for IVOV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOV.
Performance
MDYG vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYG achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has outperformed IVOV with an annualized return of 12.05%, while IVOV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.
MDYG
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 17.53%
- 1Y
- 32.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
IVOV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 22.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
MDYG vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 20.44% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 11.06% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYG and IVOV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MDYG and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDYG vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYG
IVOV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
MDYG
IVOV
Technology
MDYG
IVOV
Healthcare
MDYG
IVOV
Consumer Cyclical
MDYG
IVOV
Financial Services
MDYG
IVOV
Real Estate
MDYG
IVOV
Basic Materials
MDYG
IVOV
Energy
MDYG
IVOV
Utilities
MDYG
IVOV
Consumer Defensive
MDYG
IVOV
Communication Services
MDYG
IVOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYG vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
MDYG
IVOV
MDYG vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDYG | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.12 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 7.31 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDYG vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and IVOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYG | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -45.99% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -10.58% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -22.61% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -22.61% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.27% | -45.99% | +6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.81% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -5.41% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.06% | -0.57% |
Volatility
MDYG vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 3.71%. This indicates that MDYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYG | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 3.71% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 10.72% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 15.35% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 19.43% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 21.74% | -0.64% |
MDYG vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDYG vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IVOV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.74% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYG and IVOV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDYG has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to IVOV (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs IVOV's -45.99%.
On 10-year performance, MDYG leads with 12.05% vs 10.90% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDYG has performed better with a 12.05% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYG.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.74% for MDYG.
MDYG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IVOV is Mid Cap Value Equities. MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYG and 0.10% for IVOV.
MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYG and IVOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer