PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYG vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYG achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 11.56%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.


MDYG

1D
0.71%
1M
5.46%
YTD
18.89%
6M
19.67%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
11.56%

SPYG

1D
-0.15%
1M
8.31%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.92%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
28.58%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
18.89%7.22%15.84%17.30%-18.92%18.46%22.57%26.10%-10.46%19.61%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
14.87%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYG and SPYG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.81

The correlation between MDYG and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDYG vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYG
SPYG

Industrials

30.9%
5.0%

Technology

21.5%
51.9%

Healthcare

13.7%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
8.9%

Financial Services

7.1%
8.5%

Real Estate

5.6%
0.6%

Energy

3.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

3.7%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
1.0%

Utilities

2.0%
1.2%

Communication Services

1.5%
16.8%

Industrials

MDYG
30.9%
SPYG
5.0%

Technology

MDYG
21.5%
SPYG
51.9%

Healthcare

MDYG
13.7%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYG
8.1%
SPYG
8.9%

Financial Services

MDYG
7.1%
SPYG
8.5%

Real Estate

MDYG
5.6%
SPYG
0.6%

Energy

MDYG
3.7%
SPYG
0.1%

Basic Materials

MDYG
3.7%
SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

MDYG
2.1%
SPYG
1.0%

Utilities

MDYG
2.0%
SPYG
1.2%

Communication Services

MDYG
1.5%
SPYG
16.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYG
MDYG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MDYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYGSPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.27

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

3.07

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.71

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.69

11.22

+1.46

MDYG vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYG and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYGSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.27

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.79

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.89

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.36

+0.12

Drawdowns

MDYG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYGSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-67.63%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-13.76%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-22.14%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

-32.67%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.27%

-32.67%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-24.33%

+16.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.32%

-0.85%

Volatility

MDYG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.15%. This indicates that MDYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYGSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

4.15%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

12.43%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

16.04%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

21.17%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

20.65%

+0.41%

MDYG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than SPYG's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.75%0.87%1.20%1.16%0.69%0.71%1.21%1.36%2.23%1.25%2.51%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.46%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDYG and SPYG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDYG has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to SPYG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.32% vs 11.56% for MDYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYG.

MDYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.46% for SPYG.

MDYG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYG and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYG and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer