MDYG vs. SPYG
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG).
MDYG and SPYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. SPYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. Both MDYG and SPYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDYG or SPYG.
Key characteristics
| MDYG | SPYG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.79% | 10.32% |
| 1Y Return | 24.38% | 29.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.39% | 7.00% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.50% | 14.62% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.06% | 14.21% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.68 | 2.19 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.14% | 13.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.09% | -67.79% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.11% | -2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYG and SPYG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MDYG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDYG having a 10.79% return and SPYG slightly lower at 10.32%. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.06%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.21% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDYG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDYG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDYG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than SPYG's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 1.04% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.48% | 1.60% | 0.82% |
SPYG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.94% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% | 1.37% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
MDYG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and SPYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDYG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is 4.02%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that MDYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.