PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. IJJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. IJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than IJJ's 8.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 10.18% annualized return and IJJ not far ahead at 10.32%.


SLYV

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.30%
YTD
15.25%
6M
14.70%
1Y
37.01%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.18%

IJJ

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.82%
YTD
8.95%
6M
9.26%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. IJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
15.25%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.95%7.27%11.63%15.24%-7.11%30.45%3.56%25.66%-12.06%12.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and IJJ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000

0.91

The correlation between SLYV and IJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. IJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
IJJ

Financial Services

19.8%
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
13.5%

Industrials

11.6%
18.8%

Technology

11.3%
9.3%

Real Estate

8.7%
9.6%

Energy

7.6%
7.4%

Healthcare

7.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

7.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.5%

Utilities

2.2%
4.2%

Financial Services

SLYV
19.8%
IJJ
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.9%
IJJ
13.5%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
IJJ
18.8%

Technology

SLYV
11.3%
IJJ
9.3%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.7%
IJJ
9.6%

Energy

SLYV
7.6%
IJJ
7.4%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.5%
IJJ
3.5%

Basic Materials

SLYV
7.1%
IJJ
6.0%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
IJJ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
IJJ
5.5%

Utilities

SLYV
2.2%
IJJ
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. IJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IJJ
IJJ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. IJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLYVIJJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

1.96

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

6.76

+6.33

SLYV vs. IJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the IJJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and IJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLYVIJJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.36

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.38

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.47

-0.01

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. IJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than IJJ's maximum drawdown of -58.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and IJJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVIJJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-58.00%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-10.59%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-22.68%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-22.68%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-46.11%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.36%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-7.94%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.06%

-0.23%

Volatility

SLYV vs. IJJ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) at 3.81%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVIJJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

3.81%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

10.67%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

15.33%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

19.57%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.96%

22.04%

+1.92%

SLYV vs. IJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IJJ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. IJJ - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than IJJ's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.64%1.79%1.81%1.68%1.97%1.62%1.78%1.70%2.01%1.52%1.67%1.83%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SLYV and IJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to IJJ (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs IJJ's -58.00%.

On 10-year performance, IJJ leads with 10.32% vs 10.18% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IJJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJJ has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJJ.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.64% for IJJ.

SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IJJ is Mid Cap Value Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.18% for IJJ.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and IJJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer