IJJ vs. IJH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH).
IJJ and IJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400/Citigroup Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. IJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IJJ and IJH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IJJ or IJH.
Correlation
The correlation between IJJ and IJH is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IJJ vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IJJ:
0.78
IJH:
0.99
IJJ:
1.18
IJH:
1.46
IJJ:
1.15
IJH:
1.18
IJJ:
1.44
IJH:
1.89
IJJ:
4.02
IJH:
5.35
IJJ:
3.15%
IJH:
2.95%
IJJ:
16.15%
IJH:
15.96%
IJJ:
-58.00%
IJH:
-55.06%
IJJ:
-7.99%
IJH:
-7.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IJJ has underperformed IJH with an annualized return of 8.81%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.
IJJ
10.84%
-3.53%
10.92%
11.25%
9.85%
8.81%
IJH
14.01%
-3.24%
7.35%
14.25%
10.32%
9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJJ vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJJ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IJJ vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IJJ vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than IJH's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF | 1.82% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% | 1.65% | 1.48% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.34% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
IJJ vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than IJH's maximum drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and IJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IJJ vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.