IJJ vs. VOO
IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJJ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJJ returned 10.32%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJJ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
IJJ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IJJ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.32%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
IJJ
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 20.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
IJJ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.95% | 7.27% | 11.63% | 15.24% | -7.11% | 30.45% | 3.56% | 25.66% | -12.06% | 12.04% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJJ and VOO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IJJ and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJJ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJJ
VOO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IJJ
VOO
Industrials
IJJ
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
IJJ
VOO
Real Estate
IJJ
VOO
Technology
IJJ
VOO
Energy
IJJ
VOO
Basic Materials
IJJ
VOO
Consumer Defensive
IJJ
VOO
Utilities
IJJ
VOO
Healthcare
IJJ
VOO
Communication Services
IJJ
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJJ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
IJJ
VOO
IJJ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 3.16 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 14.73 | -7.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.39 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.83 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.87 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.89 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
IJJ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -33.99% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -8.90% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.68% | -18.69% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.68% | -24.52% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.11% | -33.99% | -12.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.70% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -3.69% | -4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.91% | +1.15% |
Volatility
IJJ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that IJJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 2.84% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 8.90% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.80% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 16.81% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 18.01% | +4.03% |
IJJ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJJ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJJ and VOO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJJ has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 10.32% for IJJ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJJ.
IJJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
IJJ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJJ and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJJ and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer