SLX vs. XLB
SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Materials funds - SLX tracks the NYSE Arca Steel Index while XLB tracks the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLX returned 19.73%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for XLB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
SLX vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 32.29% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 14.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SLX has outperformed XLB with an annualized return of 19.73%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.23% annualized return.
SLX
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- 32.29%
- 6M
- 36.55%
- 1Y
- 77.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
XLB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
SLX vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 32.29% | 47.45% | -17.94% | 31.25% | 14.28% | 27.69% | 20.57% | 12.01% | -19.27% | 24.59% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 14.35% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLX and XLB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2006 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SLX and XLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLX vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLX
XLB
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SLX
XLB
Energy
SLX
XLB
-
Industrials
SLX
XLB
Communication Services
SLX
-
XLB
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLX
-
XLB
Consumer Defensive
SLX
-
XLB
-
Financial Services
SLX
-
XLB
-
Healthcare
SLX
-
XLB
-
Real Estate
SLX
-
XLB
-
Technology
SLX
-
XLB
-
Utilities
SLX
-
XLB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLX vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
SLX
XLB
SLX vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.21 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | 1.62 | +3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.63 | 5.06 | +11.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 1.20 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.28 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.36 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
SLX vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than XLB's maximum drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -59.83% | -22.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | -12.38% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -23.17% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.62% | -24.72% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.64% | -37.27% | -24.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -3.28% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -10.84% | -27.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 3.96% | +0.71% |
Volatility
SLX vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.73%. This indicates that SLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 5.73% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.92% | 12.85% | +5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 16.78% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 18.94% | +8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.02% | 20.65% | +10.37% |
SLX vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLX vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than XLB's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.17% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLX and XLB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLX has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to XLB (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs XLB's -59.83%.
On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 19.73% vs 10.23% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for SLX.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.17% for SLX.
SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 0.13% for XLB.
SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLX and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer