SLX vs. REMX
SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLX is a Materials fund tracking the NYSE Arca Steel Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLX returned 19.18%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for REMX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
SLX vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 23.47% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 31.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SLX has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 19.18%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.
SLX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 23.47%
- 6M
- 23.68%
- 1Y
- 67.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- 19.18%
REMX
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 31.62%
- 6M
- 30.92%
- 1Y
- 155.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
SLX vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 23.47% | 47.45% | -17.94% | 31.25% | 14.28% | 27.69% | 20.57% | 12.01% | -19.27% | 24.59% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 31.62% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLX and REMX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SLX and REMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLX vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLX
REMX
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SLX
REMX
Energy
SLX
REMX
-
Industrials
SLX
REMX
-
Communication Services
SLX
-
REMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLX
-
REMX
-
Consumer Defensive
SLX
-
REMX
-
Financial Services
SLX
-
REMX
-
Healthcare
SLX
-
REMX
-
Real Estate
SLX
-
REMX
-
Technology
SLX
-
REMX
-
Utilities
SLX
-
REMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLX vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
SLX
REMX
SLX vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLX | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 6.71 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.09 | 17.79 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLX vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLX | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -90.20% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | -23.35% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -62.11% | +34.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.62% | -73.34% | +39.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.64% | -73.34% | +11.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.74% | -55.45% | +47.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.64% | -66.82% | +28.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 8.79% | -3.99% |
Volatility
SLX vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) is 9.00%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 15.65%. This indicates that SLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLX | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 15.65% | -6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 36.86% | -17.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.05% | 49.70% | -24.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.81% | 40.64% | -12.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.00% | 37.15% | -6.15% |
SLX vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLX vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than REMX's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.34% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.26% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLX and REMX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (15.65%) compared to SLX (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs REMX's -90.20%.
On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 19.18% vs 10.73% for REMX. On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, SLX has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 19.18% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.26% for SLX.
SLX is categorized as Materials, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 0.59% for REMX.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLX and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer