PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLX vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLX vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 24.30% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SLX has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 17.02%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.83% annualized return.


SLX

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.42%
6M
12.20%
YTD
24.30%
1Y
59.99%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
17.02%
ALL TIME*
7.95%

COPX

1D
-0.81%
1M
2.88%
6M
-6.70%
YTD
10.22%
1Y
89.44%
3Y*
27.01%
5Y*
18.54%
10Y*
18.83%
ALL TIME*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$193.89M$197.23M$300.83M
$3.18M$2.86M$6.08M

SLX vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
24.30%47.45%-17.94%31.25%14.28%27.69%20.57%12.01%-19.27%24.59%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
10.22%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SLX and COPX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.77

The correlation between SLX and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLX vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLX
COPX

Basic Materials

94.1%
96.9%

Energy

3.9%

-

Industrials

2.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SLX
94.1%
COPX
96.9%

Energy

SLX
3.9%
COPX

-

Industrials

SLX
2.0%
COPX
3.1%

Communication Services

SLX

-

COPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SLX

-

COPX

-

Consumer Defensive

SLX

-

COPX

-

Financial Services

SLX

-

COPX

-

Healthcare

SLX

-

COPX

-

Real Estate

SLX

-

COPX

-

Technology

SLX

-

COPX

-

Utilities

SLX

-

COPX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLX vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLX
SLX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLX vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLXCOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.18

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

7.96

+2.16

SLX vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLX and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLX vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, roughly equal to the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLXCOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.14%

-83.16%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.35%

-27.82%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-39.72%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.62%

-42.12%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.64%

-65.41%

+3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

-17.32%

+10.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-39.11%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

11.11%

-5.42%

Volatility

SLX vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) is 5.97%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 13.58%. This indicates that SLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLXCOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

13.58%

-7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

39.74%

-20.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.76%

45.77%

-21.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.63%

37.28%

-9.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.74%

35.87%

-5.13%

SLX vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLX vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than COPX's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.45%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
1.25%1.55%3.56%2.80%4.97%7.07%1.87%3.44%6.26%2.50%1.06%5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLX and COPX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COPX has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to SLX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs COPX's -83.16%.

On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 18.83% vs 17.02% for SLX. On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, SLX has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.25% for SLX.

SLX is categorized as Materials, while COPX is Copper. SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 0.65% for COPX.

SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLX and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer