SLX vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLX is a Materials fund tracking the NYSE Arca Steel Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLX returned 19.73%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for NLR. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.56% expense ratio.

Performance

SLX vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 32.29% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SLX has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 19.73%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.66% annualized return.

SLX

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 9.68%
• YTD: 32.29%
• 6M: 36.55%
• 1Y: 77.34%
• 3Y*: 26.67%
• 5Y*: 16.14%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

NLR

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: -8.11%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: 35.11%
• 5Y*: 21.94%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLX vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	32.29%	47.45%	-17.94%	31.25%	14.28%	27.69%	20.57%	12.01%	-19.27%	24.59%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	6.14%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SLX and NLR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2007	0.54

The correlation between SLX and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (10 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SLX vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SLX	NLR
Basic Materials	95.0%	-
Energy	3.5%	46.0%
Industrials	1.4%	15.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	37.4%

Return for Risk

SLX vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLX

SLX Risk / Return Rank: 86
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 25
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLX vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLX	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	0.88	+2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	1.43	+2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.17	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.76	1.43	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.63	2.93	+13.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLX vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLX and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLX	NLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	0.88	+2.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.75	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.57	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.18	+0.05

Drawdowns

SLX vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLX	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.14%	-65.05%	-17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.35%	-25.80%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.39%	-30.48%	+3.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.62%	-30.48%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.64%	-34.35%	-27.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-19.80%	+18.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.73%	-35.72%	-3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	12.61%	-7.94%

Volatility

SLX vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) is 7.87%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that SLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLX	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.87%	13.18%	-5.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.92%	32.83%	-14.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	42.32%	-18.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.72%	29.24%	-1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.02%	24.02%	+7.00%

SLX vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLX and NLR have an expense ratio of 0.56%.

Dividends

SLX vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than NLR's 2.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.40%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	1.17%	1.55%	3.56%	2.80%	4.97%	7.07%	1.87%	3.44%	6.26%	2.50%	1.06%	5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLX and NLR in my portfolio?

SLX and NLR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLX or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to SLX (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which ETF is better, SLX or NLR?

On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 19.73% vs 13.66% for NLR. Both ETFs have the same 0.56% expense ratio. On volatility, SLX has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLX or NLR?

Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 13.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLX or NLR?

SLX and NLR have the same expense ratio: 0.56% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLX or NLR?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.17% for SLX.

What is the main difference between SLX and NLR?

SLX is categorized as Materials, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.