SLVX vs. SLVP
SLVX (Nicholas Silver Income ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both Silver funds. SLVX is actively managed, while SLVP is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SLVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
SLVX vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SLVX
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- -24.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- -17.78%
- 6M
- -27.63%
- YTD
- -15.05%
- 1Y
- 62.82%
- 3Y*
- 41.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
SLVX vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | -34.14% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -26.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVX and SLVP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVX vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
SLVX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLVP
SLVX vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Silver Income ETF (SLVX) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVX | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVX vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVX drawdown since its inception was -45.89%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVX and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVX | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.89% | -80.47% | +34.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.89% | -38.72% | -7.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -46.70% | +22.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.42% | — |
Volatility
SLVX vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVX | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.98% | 55.88% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.98% | 43.49% | +17.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.98% | 42.51% | +18.47% |
SLVX vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVX vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
SLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.60%, more than SLVP's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.43% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | 12.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SLVX and SLVP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for SLVX.
SLVX has the higher dividend yield at 12.60%, compared with 2.43% for SLVP.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for SLVX and 0.39% for SLVP.
Find the right allocation for SLVX and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer