SLVX vs. SLVO

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SLVX (Nicholas Silver Income ETF) and SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) are both Silver funds. SLVX is actively managed, while SLVO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVO.

Performance

SLVX vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Silver Income ETF (SLVX) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SLVX

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -7.47%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLVO

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -7.88%
• 6M: -4.56%
• YTD: -2.84%
• 1Y: 29.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVX vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF	-28.30%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	-3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVX and SLVO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

SLVX vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SLVO

SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 37
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVX vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Silver Income ETF (SLVX) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLVX	SLVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.02	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.38	—

Drawdowns

SLVX vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVX drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than SLVO's maximum drawdown of -21.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVX and SLVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVX	SLVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-21.39%	-21.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.09%	-17.14%	-23.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.71%	-3.62%	-20.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLVX	SLVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.28%	32.70%	+28.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.28%	26.54%	+34.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.28%	26.54%	+34.74%

SLVX vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVX vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison

SLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, less than SLVO's 68.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	68.28%	19.35%	14.45%
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF	11.08%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVX and SLVO in my portfolio?

SLVX and SLVO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLVX or SLVO?

On fees, SLVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVX or SLVO?

SLVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for SLVX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLVX or SLVO?

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 68.28%, compared with 11.08% for SLVX.

What is the main difference between SLVX and SLVO?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for SLVX and 0.65% for SLVO.