SLVX vs. GBUG
SLVX (Nicholas Silver Income ETF) and GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVX is a Silver fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth, while GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SLVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for GBUG.
Performance
SLVX vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SLVX
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GBUG
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- -17.22%
- YTD
- -11.43%
- 1Y
- 59.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 60.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.01M | $985.52K | $1.44M | |
| $209.15K | $204.32K | $206.07K |
SLVX vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | -32.32% |
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF | -22.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVX and GBUG is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVX vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank
SLVX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GBUG
SLVX vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Silver Income ETF (SLVX) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVX | GBUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVX vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVX drawdown since its inception was -45.91%, which is greater than GBUG's maximum drawdown of -37.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVX and GBUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVX | GBUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.91% | -37.35% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.39% | -33.49% | -10.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.32% | -10.30% | -16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.73% | — |
Volatility
SLVX vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVX | GBUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.89% | 51.46% | +8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 48.42% | +11.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 48.42% | +11.47% |
SLVX vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVX vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison
SLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.35%, more than GBUG's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF | 1.76% | 1.56% |
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | 13.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SLVX and GBUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GBUG is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBUG is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for SLVX.
SLVX has the higher dividend yield at 13.35%, compared with 1.76% for GBUG.
SLVX is categorized as Silver, while GBUG is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for SLVX and 0.89% for GBUG.
Find the right allocation for SLVX and GBUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer