SLVX vs. PSLV
SLVX (Nicholas Silver Income ETF) and PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) are both Silver funds. SLVX is actively managed, while PSLV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for PSLV.
Performance
SLVX vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SLVX
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- -14.36%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSLV
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- -8.84%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 76.87%
- 3Y*
- 38.76%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
SLVX vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | -19.87% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | -10.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVX and PSLV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVX vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank
SLVX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSLV
SLVX vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Silver Income ETF (SLVX) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVX | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVX vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVX drawdown since its inception was -40.32%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVX and PSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVX | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.32% | -79.38% | +39.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.17% | -40.70% | +6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -58.11% | +37.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.49% | — |
Volatility
SLVX vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVX | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 58.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.23% | 59.54% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.23% | 35.99% | +26.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.23% | 31.33% | +30.90% |
SLVX vs. PSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLV's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVX vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison
SLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% |
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | 8.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SLVX and PSLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for SLVX.
SLVX has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for SLVX and 0.51% for PSLV.
Find the right allocation for SLVX and PSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer