SLVX vs. SILJ
SLVX (Nicholas Silver Income ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both Silver funds. SLVX is actively managed, while SILJ is passively managed. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SLVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
SLVX vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SLVX
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -24.25%
- YTD
- -12.94%
- 1Y
- 68.80%
- 3Y*
- 38.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $79.44M | $79.47M | $126.28M | |
| $209.15K | $204.32K | $206.07K |
SLVX vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | -32.32% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -25.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVX and SILJ is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVX vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
SLVX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SILJ
SLVX vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Silver Income ETF (SLVX) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVX | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVX vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVX drawdown since its inception was -45.91%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVX and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVX | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.91% | -79.04% | +33.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.39% | -40.22% | -4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.32% | -41.36% | +15.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.08% | — |
Volatility
SLVX vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVX | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.89% | 58.44% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 45.12% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 46.34% | +13.55% |
SLVX vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVX vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
SLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.35%, more than SILJ's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.30% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
SLVX Nicholas Silver Income ETF | 13.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SLVX and SILJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for SLVX.
SLVX has the higher dividend yield at 13.35%, compared with 2.30% for SILJ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for SLVX and 0.69% for SILJ.
Find the right allocation for SLVX and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer