SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO
SLVU.TO (BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF) and SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) are both Silver funds - SLVU.TO tracks the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER while SVR-C.TO tracks the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVU.TO returned 7.42%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SVR-C.TO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLVU.TO charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR-C.TO.
Performance
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVU.TO achieves a -32.84% return, which is significantly lower than SVR-C.TO's 3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVU.TO has underperformed SVR-C.TO with an annualized return of 7.42%, while SVR-C.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
SLVU.TO
- 1D
- -5.36%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -32.84%
- 6M
- -7.57%
- 1Y
- 133.37%
- 3Y*
- 49.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 112.17%
- 3Y*
- 46.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF | -32.84% | 349.11% | 20.71% | -16.01% | -10.21% | -34.59% | 55.46% | 16.28% | -26.54% | 1.00% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 3.58% | 132.91% | 30.61% | -2.65% | 9.31% | -12.72% | 43.88% | 9.28% | -2.35% | -2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVU.TO and SVR-C.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2011 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, SLVU.TO and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.70, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLVU.TO
SVR-C.TO
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVU.TO | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.72 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 5.83 | -2.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVU.TO | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.99 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.72 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.56 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.23 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -61.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVU.TO and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVU.TO | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.60% | -61.14% | -37.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -41.54% | -35.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.62% | -41.54% | -35.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.62% | -41.54% | -35.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.27% | -41.54% | -38.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.63% | -35.92% | -54.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.56% | -35.58% | -46.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.19% | 19.30% | +20.89% |
Volatility
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 34.08% compared to iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) at 16.01%. This indicates that SLVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVU.TO | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.08% | 16.01% | +18.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.13% | 55.45% | +76.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.13% | 56.72% | +61.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.80% | 36.57% | +37.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.52% | 33.57% | +31.95% |
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVU.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVU.TO vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVU.TO nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SLVU.TO and SVR-C.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SVR-C.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SVR-C.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for SLVU.TO.
SLVU.TO tracks Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.20% for SLVU.TO and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for SLVU.TO and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer