SLVU.TO vs. GDXU
Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU).
SLVU.TO and GDXU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLVU.TO is a passively managed fund by Horizons ETFs that tracks the performance of the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. It was launched on Jun 29, 2009. GDXU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. Both SLVU.TO and GDXU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF | -24.53% | 349.11% | 20.71% | -16.01% | -10.21% | -34.59% | 18.81% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | -16.23% | 755.35% | -11.61% | -23.09% | -60.17% | -55.34% | 3.81% |
Different Trading Currencies
SLVU.TO is traded in CAD, while GDXU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDXU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVU.TO achieves a -24.53% return, which is significantly lower than GDXU's -16.23% return.
SLVU.TO
- 1D
- 14.89%
- 1M
- -38.47%
- YTD
- -24.53%
- 6M
- 53.78%
- 1Y
- 149.33%
- 3Y*
- 52.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
GDXU
- 1D
- 21.23%
- 1M
- -57.22%
- YTD
- -16.23%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- 225.77%
- 3Y*
- 58.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVU.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
SLVU.TO
GDXU
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVU.TO | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.65 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.20 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 3.21 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 9.07 | -3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVU.TO | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.65 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.05 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.02 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVU.TO and GDXU is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVU.TO nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXU drawdown of -93.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVU.TO and GDXU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVU.TO | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.60% | -94.39% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -73.16% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.62% | -93.34% | +16.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.47% | -61.64% | -27.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.27% | -69.98% | -14.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.12% | 25.85% | +2.27% |
Volatility
SLVU.TO vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) is 38.33%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a volatility of 57.40%. This indicates that SLVU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLVU.TO | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.33% | 57.40% | -19.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 130.40% | 120.44% | +9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 114.99% | 137.71% | -22.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.06% | 105.87% | -33.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.51% | 105.89% | -41.38% |