SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO).
SLVU.TO and CNDU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLVU.TO is a passively managed fund by Horizons ETFs that tracks the performance of the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. It was launched on Jun 29, 2009. CNDU.TO is a passively managed fund by Horizons ETFs that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60 Index. It was launched on Jan 8, 2007. Both SLVU.TO and CNDU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF | -24.53% | 349.11% | 20.71% | -16.01% | -10.21% | -34.59% | 55.46% | 16.28% | -26.54% | 1.00% |
CNDU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF | 4.34% | 54.27% | 34.82% | 15.07% | -17.75% | 59.15% | -4.99% | 42.24% | -19.24% | 15.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVU.TO achieves a -24.53% return, which is significantly lower than CNDU.TO's 4.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVU.TO has underperformed CNDU.TO with an annualized return of 10.30%, while CNDU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.53% annualized return.
SLVU.TO
- 1D
- 14.89%
- 1M
- -38.47%
- YTD
- -24.53%
- 6M
- 53.78%
- 1Y
- 149.33%
- 3Y*
- 52.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
CNDU.TO
- 1D
- 4.89%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.85%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVU.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDU.TO's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLVU.TO
CNDU.TO
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVU.TO | CNDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 2.02 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.47 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.94 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 13.41 | -8.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVU.TO | CNDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 2.02 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.87 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.62 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.26 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVU.TO and CNDU.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVU.TO nor CNDU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than CNDU.TO's maximum drawdown of -78.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVU.TO and CNDU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVU.TO | CNDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.60% | -78.08% | -20.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -20.72% | -55.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.62% | -32.60% | -44.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.27% | -61.51% | -18.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.47% | -8.17% | -81.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.27% | -23.55% | -60.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.12% | 4.55% | +23.57% |
Volatility
SLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 38.33% compared to BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) at 10.76%. This indicates that SLVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLVU.TO | CNDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.33% | 10.76% | +27.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 130.40% | 19.82% | +110.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 114.99% | 29.08% | +85.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.06% | 25.44% | +46.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.51% | 30.07% | +34.44% |