SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLVU.TO (BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF) and QQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVU.TO is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while QQCL.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. SLVU.TO is passively managed, while QQCL.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, SLVU.TO returned 133.37% vs 43.99% for QQCL.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVU.TO charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QQCL.TO.

Performance

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVU.TO achieves a -32.84% return, which is significantly lower than QQCL.TO's 20.85% return.

SLVU.TO

• 1D: -5.36%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: -32.84%
• 6M: -7.57%
• 1Y: 133.37%
• 3Y*: 49.77%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: 7.42%

QQCL.TO

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 12.39%
• YTD: 20.85%
• 6M: 17.94%
• 1Y: 43.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF	-32.84%	349.11%	20.71%	12.27%
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	20.85%	13.10%	41.38%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVU.TO and QQCL.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023	0.08

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SLVU.TO	QQCL.TO
Real Estate	26.4%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.6%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	5.3%
Industrials	-	3.4%
Technology	-	50.0%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVU.TO

SLVU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 36
SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
SLVU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SLVU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SLVU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SLVU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

QQCL.TO

QQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLVU.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.81	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	3.65	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.51	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	4.14	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.33	15.49	-12.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVU.TO and QQCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLVU.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	2.81	-1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	1.52	-1.54

Drawdowns

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than QQCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVU.TO and QQCL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVU.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.60%	-25.63%	-72.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.62%	-10.68%	-65.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-76.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.63%	0.00%	-90.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.56%	-3.32%	-79.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.19%	2.85%	+37.34%

Volatility

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 34.08% compared to Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) at 4.30%. This indicates that SLVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVU.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.08%	4.30%	+29.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.13%	12.58%	+119.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	118.13%	15.74%	+102.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.80%	20.38%	+53.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.52%	20.38%	+45.14%

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVU.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCL.TO's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

SLVU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	13.15%	14.54%	11.87%	3.68%
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVU.TO and QQCL.TO in my portfolio?

SLVU.TO and QQCL.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLVU.TO or QQCL.TO?

On fees, QQCL.TO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVU.TO or QQCL.TO?

QQCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for SLVU.TO.

What is the main difference between SLVU.TO and QQCL.TO?

SLVU.TO is categorized as Silver, while QQCL.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 2.20% for SLVU.TO and 0.85% for QQCL.TO.