SLVR vs. LITP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLVR (Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF) and LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index, while LITP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLVR returned 118.11% vs 218.79% for LITP. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

SLVR vs. LITP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVR achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than LITP's 28.96% return.

SLVR

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 6M: 18.93%
• 1Y: 118.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LITP

• 1D: -4.66%
• 1M: -7.17%
• YTD: 28.96%
• 6M: 41.58%
• 1Y: 218.79%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVR vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	6.80%	170.44%
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	28.96%	77.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVR and LITP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

SLVR vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVR

SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 51
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 87
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVR vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLVR	LITP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	3.78	-1.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.67	-1.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.45	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	7.08	-4.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.66	21.48	-13.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLVR vs. LITP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the LITP Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVR and LITP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLVR	LITP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	3.78	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.02	-0.07	+2.08

Drawdowns

SLVR vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVR drawdown since its inception was -38.60%, smaller than the maximum LITP drawdown of -74.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR and LITP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVR	LITP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.60%	-74.72%	+36.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.60%	-31.12%	-7.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-74.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.51%	-14.47%	-14.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.24%	-42.29%	+33.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.47%	10.23%	+5.24%

Volatility

SLVR vs. LITP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a higher volatility of 19.31% compared to Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) at 13.36%. This indicates that SLVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LITP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVR	LITP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.31%	13.36%	+5.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.02%	39.69%	+11.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.64%	58.34%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.85%	47.34%	+10.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.85%	47.34%	+10.51%

SLVR vs. LITP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLVR and LITP have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

SLVR vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison

SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than LITP's 5.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	5.74%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	3.45%	3.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVR and LITP in my portfolio?

SLVR and LITP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLVR or LITP?

SLVR has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to LITP (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVR dropped -38.60% vs LITP's -74.72%.

Which ETF is better, SLVR or LITP?

On 1-year performance, LITP leads with 218.79% vs 118.11% for SLVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, LITP has been the lower-risk option at 13.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLVR or LITP?

Over the 1-year period, LITP has performed better with a 218.79% return vs 118.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVR or LITP?

SLVR and LITP have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLVR or LITP?

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 3.45% for SLVR.

What is the main difference between SLVR and LITP?

SLVR is categorized as Silver, while LITP is Energy Equities. SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index, while LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.