PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVR vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SLVR vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SLVR vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLVR
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF
6.06%170.44%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
7.00%135.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVR achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 7.00% return.


SLVR

1D
8.91%
1M
-29.01%
YTD
6.06%
6M
38.57%
1Y
156.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDX

1D
6.97%
1M
-20.78%
YTD
7.00%
6M
20.99%
1Y
101.08%
3Y*
43.23%
5Y*
23.96%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLVR vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SLVR vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVR
SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVR vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVRGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.21

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

2.45

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.34

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.77

12.07

+1.70

SLVR vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVR Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVR and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVRGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.21

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.42

0.14

+2.28

Correlation

The correlation between SLVR and GDX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SLVR vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than GDX's 0.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLVR
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF
3.47%3.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.69%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Drawdowns

SLVR vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVR drawdown since its inception was -38.60%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR and GDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVRGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.60%

-80.34%

+41.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.60%

-30.84%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.01%

-20.78%

-8.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-40.61%

+33.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.21%

8.52%

+2.69%

Volatility

SLVR vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a higher volatility of 23.19% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 18.51%. This indicates that SLVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SLVRGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.19%

18.51%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.62%

38.19%

+15.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.25%

46.00%

+15.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.32%

35.73%

+22.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.32%

37.44%

+20.88%