SLVP vs. XRH0.L
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 9.87%/yr vs 27.32%/yr for XRH0.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for XRH0.L.
Performance
SLVP vs. XRH0.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly higher than XRH0.L's -28.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has underperformed XRH0.L with an annualized return of 9.87%, while XRH0.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.32% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 76.85%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -28.17%
- 6M
- -23.84%
- 1Y
- 40.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- -15.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.32%
SLVP vs. XRH0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.65% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -28.17% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and XRH0.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.07 |
The correlation between SLVP and XRH0.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. XRH0.L — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
XRH0.L
SLVP vs. XRH0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.00 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 1.91 | +2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. XRH0.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum XRH0.L drawdown of -85.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and XRH0.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -85.90% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -40.30% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -46.87% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.01% | -81.27% | +33.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -85.90% | +23.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.83% | -67.56% | +32.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.74% | -50.59% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.80% | 21.21% | -5.41% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. XRH0.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is 19.38%, while Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a volatility of 28.09%. This indicates that SLVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRH0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.38% | 28.09% | -8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.84% | 70.45% | -24.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.46% | 89.78% | -34.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 69.02% | -25.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 66.84% | -24.33% |
SLVP vs. XRH0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than XRH0.L's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVP vs. XRH0.L - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and XRH0.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
SLVP is categorized as Silver, while XRH0.L is Metals. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while XRH0.L tracks Rhodium. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.95% for XRH0.L.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and XRH0.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer