PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVP vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLVP vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 13.10%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.14% annualized return.


SLVP

1D
6.68%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
0.95%
6M
5.72%
1Y
93.96%
3Y*
52.67%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
13.10%

XME

1D
0.16%
1M
4.36%
YTD
16.50%
6M
19.83%
1Y
85.37%
3Y*
35.28%
5Y*
22.93%
10Y*
19.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVP vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
0.95%202.84%14.47%-2.31%-18.06%-23.53%56.45%37.71%-22.10%4.53%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
16.50%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVP and XME is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.53

The correlation between SLVP and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (10 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SLVP vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLVP
XME

Basic Materials

99.6%
74.9%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.8%

Energy

-

23.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SLVP
99.6%
XME
74.9%

Financial Services

SLVP
0.0%
XME

-

Communication Services

SLVP

-

XME

-

Consumer Cyclical

SLVP

-

XME

-

Consumer Defensive

SLVP

-

XME
0.8%

Energy

SLVP

-

XME
23.8%

Healthcare

SLVP

-

XME

-

Industrials

SLVP

-

XME
0.4%

Real Estate

SLVP

-

XME

-

Technology

SLVP

-

XME
2.2%

Utilities

SLVP

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVP vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVP vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLVPXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.80

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

9.44

-2.90

SLVP vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVP and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLVP vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVPXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.47%

-85.89%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.06%

-22.60%

-15.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.06%

-30.47%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.79%

-37.27%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

-61.69%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.18%

-9.18%

-18.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.77%

-44.08%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.41%

9.07%

+5.34%

Volatility

SLVP vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 20.77% compared to SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) at 15.14%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVPXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.77%

15.14%

+5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.32%

28.15%

+17.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.01%

36.17%

+18.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

32.83%

+10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.48%

32.93%

+9.55%

SLVP vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLVP vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
2.17%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVP and XME have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVP has higher volatility (20.77%) compared to XME (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.14% vs 13.10% for SLVP. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XME has been the lower-risk option at 15.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.

SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

SLVP is categorized as Silver, while XME is Materials. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVP and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer