SLVP vs. SVM
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 9.87%/yr vs 16.92%/yr for SVM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SLVP vs. SVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly lower than SVM's 21.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has underperformed SVM with an annualized return of 9.87%, while SVM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.92% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 76.85%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
SVM
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- -20.20%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 140.00%
- 3Y*
- 53.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.92%
SLVP vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.65% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 21.23% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and SVM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SLVP and SVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
SVM
SLVP vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.61 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 9.64 | -4.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and SVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -98.00% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -39.02% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -42.86% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.01% | -62.98% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -76.19% | +14.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.83% | -48.92% | +14.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.74% | -71.59% | +24.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.80% | 14.57% | +1.23% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is 19.38%, while Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a volatility of 27.03%. This indicates that SLVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.38% | 27.03% | -7.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.84% | 57.80% | -11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.46% | 70.44% | -14.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 56.00% | -12.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 61.93% | -19.42% |
Dividends
SLVP vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than SVM's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and SVM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (27.03%) compared to SLVP (19.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs SVM's -98.00%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and SVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer