SLVP vs. SSRM
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 12.67%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for SSRM. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SLVP vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 24.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has outperformed SSRM with an annualized return of 12.67%, while SSRM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 83.53%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
SSRM
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -21.64%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 119.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
SLVP vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 24.22% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and SSRM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SLVP and SSRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
SSRM
SLVP vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.83 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 9.89 | -4.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -91.68% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -31.28% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -73.41% | +35.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.26% | -83.16% | +28.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -83.16% | +21.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.74% | -37.45% | +5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.78% | -57.15% | +10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.31% | 12.09% | +2.22% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) have volatilities of 19.61% and 19.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 19.31% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.17% | 54.27% | -9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 66.63% | -12.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 55.93% | -12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 52.96% | -10.51% |
Dividends
SLVP vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and SSRM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to SSRM (19.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs SSRM's -91.68%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer