SLVP vs. HYMC
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SLVP returned 16.22%/yr vs -4.20%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLVP vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's -1.56% return.
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 76.85%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
HYMC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -29.20%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 647.60%
- 3Y*
- 99.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.65% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -16.22% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -1.56% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and HYMC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, SLVP and HYMC have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
HYMC
SLVP vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.50 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 10.70 | -8.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 26.26 | -21.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -98.89% | +18.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -61.07% | +23.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -63.45% | +25.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.01% | -93.90% | +45.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.83% | -85.21% | +50.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.74% | -63.47% | +16.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.80% | 24.84% | -9.04% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is 19.38%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.56%. This indicates that SLVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.38% | 26.56% | -7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.84% | 86.12% | -40.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.46% | 118.45% | -62.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 152.82% | -109.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 122.79% | -80.28% |
Dividends
SLVP vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and HYMC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (26.56%) compared to SLVP (19.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs HYMC's -98.89%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer