SLV vs. HUMN

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill. SLV is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.

Performance

SLV vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -7.62% return, which is significantly lower than HUMN's 21.30% return.

SLV

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -14.31%
• YTD: -7.62%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: 81.88%
• 3Y*: 38.96%
• 5Y*: 20.04%
• 10Y*: 13.58%

HUMN

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 6M: 24.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-7.62%	95.15%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	21.30%	20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and HUMN is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

SLV vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 36
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 28

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLV	HUMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.68	—	—

Drawdowns

SLV vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and HUMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLV	HUMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.28%	-20.40%	-55.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.65%	-6.94%	-36.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.65%	-4.60%	-40.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLV	HUMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.10%	30.73%	+29.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.50%	30.73%	+5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.04%	30.73%	+1.31%

SLV vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLV vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.60%	0.72%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLV and HUMN in my portfolio?

SLV and HUMN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLV or HUMN?

On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLV or HUMN?

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLV or HUMN?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

What is the main difference between SLV and HUMN?

SLV is categorized as Silver, while HUMN is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.75% for HUMN.