GDYN vs. BBAI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI).

Performance

GDYN vs. BBAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GDYN vs. BBAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GDYN Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.	-36.88%	-59.40%	66.84%	18.81%	-70.45%	1.33%
BBAI BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.	-34.81%	21.35%	107.94%	217.65%	-88.10%	-35.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GDYN : $492.72M BBAI : $12.63B
EPS GDYN : $0.11 BBAI : -$0.20
PS Ratio GDYN : 1.19 BBAI : 40.04
PB Ratio GDYN : 0.91 BBAI : 20.64
Total Revenue (TTM) GDYN : $411.83M BBAI : $127.67M
Gross Profit (TTM) GDYN : $142.35M BBAI : $28.48M
EBITDA (TTM) GDYN : $13.93M BBAI : -$253.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDYN achieves a -36.88% return, which is significantly lower than BBAI's -34.81% return.

GDYN

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -15.56%
• YTD: -36.88%
• 6M: -26.07%
• 1Y: -63.58%
• 3Y*: -20.77%
• 5Y*: -18.55%
• 10Y*: —

BBAI

• 1D: 15.79%
• 1M: -11.11%
• YTD: -34.81%
• 6M: -46.01%
• 1Y: 23.08%
• 3Y*: 12.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GDYN vs. BBAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDYN

GDYN Risk / Return Rank: 4
GDYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GDYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GDYN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GDYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GDYN Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BBAI

BBAI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BBAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BBAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BBAI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BBAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BBAI Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDYN vs. BBAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDYN	BBAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.11	0.22	-1.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.05	1.24	-3.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.13	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	0.24	-1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	0.51	-2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDYN vs. BBAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDYN Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the BBAI Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDYN and BBAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDYN	BBAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.11	0.22	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	-0.11	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between GDYN and BBAI is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GDYN vs. BBAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDYN nor BBAI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GDYN vs. BBAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDYN drawdown since its inception was -86.88%, smaller than the maximum BBAI drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDYN and BBAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDYN	BBAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.88%	-95.01%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.68%	-65.88%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.45%	-72.26%	-14.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.09%	-71.00%	+26.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.13%	31.07%	+11.06%

Volatility

GDYN vs. BBAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) is 14.50%, while BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) has a volatility of 22.77%. This indicates that GDYN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDYN	BBAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.50%	22.77%	-8.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.77%	66.27%	-23.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.36%	104.87%	-47.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.42%	178.01%	-115.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.46%	178.01%	-121.55%

Financials

GDYN vs. BBAI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GDYN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.14M and revenue of 106.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

BBAI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.55M and revenue of 27.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.

GDYN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 506.00K and revenue of 106.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

BBAI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.27M and revenue of 27.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -88.9%.

GDYN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 306.00K and revenue of 106.15M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

BBAI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -5.83M and revenue of 27.30M, resulting in a net margin of -21.4%.