PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDYN vs. BBAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GDYN vs. BBAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDYN achieves a -16.94% return, which is significantly lower than BBAI's -5.37% return.


GDYN

1D
-4.58%
1M
29.09%
YTD
-16.94%
6M
-14.19%
1Y
-37.50%
3Y*
-8.56%
5Y*
-13.37%
10Y*

BBAI

1D
-4.31%
1M
23.43%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-11.74%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
36.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDYN vs. BBAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.
-16.94%-59.40%66.84%18.81%-70.45%1.33%
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
-5.37%21.35%107.94%217.65%-88.10%-35.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GDYN and BBAI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GDYN:

$635.10M

BBAI:

$24.17B

EPS

GDYN:

$0.06

BBAI:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

GDYN:

1.55

BBAI:

91.16

PB Ratio

GDYN:

1.20

BBAI:

30.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

GDYN:

$415.51M

BBAI:

$127.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GDYN:

$141.58M

BBAI:

$32.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

GDYN:

$14.03M

BBAI:

-$230.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDYN vs. BBAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDYN
GDYN Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GDYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDYN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GDYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDYN Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BBAI
BBAI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BBAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDYN vs. BBAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDYNBBAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

0.30

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.79

1.27

-2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.13

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

0.35

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.10

0.60

-1.70

GDYN vs. BBAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDYN Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the BBAI Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDYN and BBAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDYNBBAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

0.30

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.07

+0.01

Drawdowns

GDYN vs. BBAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDYN drawdown since its inception was -87.45%, smaller than the maximum BBAI drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDYN and BBAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDYNBBAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.45%

-95.01%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.38%

-65.88%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.05%

-75.56%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.18%

-59.73%

-22.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.01%

-70.89%

+25.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.40%

38.23%

-1.83%

Volatility

GDYN vs. BBAI - Volatility Comparison

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) have volatilities of 20.42% and 20.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDYNBBAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.42%

20.75%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.24%

57.00%

-16.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.35%

97.63%

-40.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.92%

175.10%

-112.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.51%

175.10%

-118.59%

Dividends

GDYN vs. BBAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDYN nor BBAI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GDYN vs. BBAI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
104.10M
34.44M
(GDYN) Total Revenue
(BBAI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GDYN and BBAI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBAI has higher volatility (20.75%) compared to GDYN (20.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDYN dropped -87.45% vs BBAI's -95.01%.

BBAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDYN and BBAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer