GDYN vs. META
GDYN (Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. GDYN operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, GDYN returned -22.06%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for META. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDYN vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDYN achieves a -39.98% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.67% return.
GDYN
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -23.98%
- YTD
- -39.98%
- 6M
- -41.09%
- 1Y
- -53.11%
- 3Y*
- -15.01%
- 5Y*
- -22.06%
- 10Y*
- —
META
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -19.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
GDYN vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDYN Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. | -39.98% | -59.40% | 66.84% | 18.81% | -70.45% | 201.35% | 16.13% | 12.09% | 1.89% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.67% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -7.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDYN and META is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between GDYN and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GDYN:
$458.97M
META:
$1.44T
GDYN:
$0.06
META:
$27.47
GDYN:
88.08
META:
20.47
GDYN:
1.12
META:
6.72
GDYN:
0.87
META:
5.92
GDYN:
$415.51M
META:
$214.96B
GDYN:
$141.58M
META:
$176.14B
GDYN:
$14.03M
META:
$106.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDYN vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
GDYN
META
GDYN vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDYN | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.93 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.58 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | -1.16 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDYN vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDYN drawdown since its inception was -87.45%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDYN and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDYN | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.45% | -76.74% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.38% | -33.30% | -24.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.05% | -34.15% | -43.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.45% | -76.74% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.12% | -28.60% | -58.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.28% | -15.84% | -29.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.23% | 16.58% | +21.65% |
Volatility
GDYN vs. META - Volatility Comparison
Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) has a higher volatility of 18.47% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 12.90%. This indicates that GDYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDYN | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.47% | 12.90% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.30% | 27.85% | +13.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.60% | 36.18% | +22.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 44.18% | +18.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.54% | 38.76% | +17.78% |
Dividends
GDYN vs. META - Dividend Comparison
GDYN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDYN Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Financials
GDYN vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GDYN vs. META - Profitability Comparison
GDYN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.23M and revenue of 104.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
GDYN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.68M and revenue of 104.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
GDYN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -1.47M and revenue of 104.10M, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDYN and META have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDYN has higher volatility (18.47%) compared to META (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDYN dropped -87.45% vs META's -76.74%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDYN and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer