SLMCX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
SLMCX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLMCX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 0.17% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -8.12% | 34.08% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMCX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 22.20%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.05% annualized return.
SLMCX
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 58.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.20%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLMCX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLMCX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SLMCX
VOO
SLMCX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLMCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 0.98 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.50 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 1.53 | +2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 7.29 | +6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLMCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 0.98 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.70 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.78 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.83 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMCX and VOO is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLMCX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 9.44% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
SLMCX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.10% | -33.99% | -34.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -11.98% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.32% | -24.52% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -33.99% | -3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.96% | -6.29% | -5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -3.72% | -9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 2.52% | +1.41% |
Volatility
SLMCX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that SLMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLMCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 5.29% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 9.44% | +11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 18.10% | +12.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 16.82% | +9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 17.99% | +7.94% |