SLMCX vs. FIKHX

In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a -11.05% return, which is significantly lower than FIKHX's -9.99% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SLMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the FIKHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLMCX and FIKHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.05%, while FIKHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -86.89%, which is greater than FIKHX's maximum drawdown of -46.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and FIKHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) is 14.94%, while Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that SLMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.