PortfoliosLab logo
SLMCX vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SLMCX and VGT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SLMCX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,467.07%
1,302.09%
SLMCX
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLMCX:

0.17

VGT:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

SLMCX:

0.42

VGT:

0.71

Omega Ratio

SLMCX:

1.06

VGT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

SLMCX:

0.16

VGT:

0.41

Martin Ratio

SLMCX:

0.51

VGT:

1.34

Ulcer Index

SLMCX:

9.19%

VGT:

8.30%

Daily Std Dev

SLMCX:

28.59%

VGT:

29.76%

Max Drawdown

SLMCX:

-86.89%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

SLMCX:

-16.48%

VGT:

-11.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a -11.05% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's -8.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMCX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 17.51%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.31% annualized return.


SLMCX

YTD

-11.05%

1M

17.85%

6M

-9.17%

1Y

4.78%

5Y*

18.75%

10Y*

17.51%

VGT

YTD

-8.02%

1M

21.43%

6M

-8.47%

1Y

11.41%

5Y*

18.79%

10Y*

19.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLMCX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLMCX vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLMCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLMCX is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLMCX is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLMCX is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLMCX is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLMCX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLMCX is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SLMCX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SLMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLMCX and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.17
0.39
SLMCX
VGT

Dividends

SLMCX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.05%, more than VGT's 0.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund
16.05%14.27%5.16%9.42%11.75%10.40%11.44%12.33%11.15%8.19%10.79%12.70%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.56%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

SLMCX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -86.89%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.48%
-11.63%
SLMCX
VGT

Volatility

SLMCX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) have volatilities of 14.94% and 15.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.94%
15.45%
SLMCX
VGT