SLLAX vs. GQSCX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SLLAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund) and GQSCX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SLLAX returned 8.57%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for GQSCX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SLLAX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GQSCX.

Performance

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLLAX achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly lower than GQSCX's 25.75% return.

SLLAX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 11.12%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 1Y: 32.26%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: 10.24%
• ALL TIME*: 10.59%

GQSCX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 17.30%
• YTD: 25.75%
• 1Y: 53.15%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SLLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund	18.93%	9.98%	13.04%	13.46%	-15.64%	25.33%	15.78%	23.55%	-13.26%	1.39%
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	25.75%	12.22%	11.49%	18.94%	-8.48%	31.77%	7.60%	22.17%	-11.32%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SLLAX and GQSCX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017	0.96

The correlation between SLLAX and GQSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SLLAX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLLAX

SLLAX Risk / Return Rank: 73
SLLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SLLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SLLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SLLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SLLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

GQSCX

GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLLAX	GQSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.78	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	3.92	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.47	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	5.73	-2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.03	21.78	-11.75

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the GQSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLLAX and GQSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLLAX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum GQSCX drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLLAX and GQSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLLAX	GQSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-46.87%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.53%	-8.74%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.52%	-28.83%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.82%	-28.83%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-1.28%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.71%	-8.03%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.31%	+0.68%

Volatility

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) at 3.31%. This indicates that SLLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLLAX	GQSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	3.31%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.71%	12.54%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.72%	18.07%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.77%	21.74%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.14%	24.65%	-2.51%

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GQSCX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLLAX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison

SLLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than GQSCX's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	2.62%	3.01%	10.53%	0.70%	9.45%	10.41%	0.51%	0.59%	0.77%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%
SLLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund	8.95%	10.74%	14.01%	3.72%	0.84%	22.64%	0.18%	0.14%	16.14%	7.15%	0.15%	11.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLLAX and GQSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SLLAX and GQSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SLLAX or GQSCX?

SLLAX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to GQSCX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLLAX dropped -44.08% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.