PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLLAX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLLAX achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 20.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SLLAX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.52% annualized return.


SLLAX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.42%
YTD
14.62%
6M
15.68%
1Y
31.48%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
10.07%

NASDX

1D
0.61%
1M
10.17%
YTD
20.81%
6M
19.57%
1Y
42.51%
3Y*
32.44%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
22.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund
14.62%9.98%13.04%13.46%-15.64%25.33%15.78%23.55%-13.26%9.73%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
20.81%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SLLAX and NASDX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

0.74

The correlation between SLLAX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLLAX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLLAX
SLLAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SLLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLLAXNASDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

2.72

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.53

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.64

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.36

14.18

-3.82

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLLAX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLLAXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.72

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.87

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.00

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.33

+0.15

Drawdowns

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLLAX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLLAX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLLAXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-83.16%

+39.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-11.90%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.52%

-22.71%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.82%

-35.33%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-35.33%

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-34.38%

+26.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.06%

-0.05%

Volatility

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) at 4.53%. This indicates that SLLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLLAXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.53%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

12.21%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

16.13%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

23.06%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

22.68%

-0.49%

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLLAX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

SLLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, more than NASDX's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.00%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%
SLLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund
9.34%10.74%14.01%3.72%0.84%22.64%0.18%0.14%16.14%7.15%0.15%11.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLLAX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLLAX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to NASDX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLLAX dropped -44.08% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLLAX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer