SLJY vs. QRMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI).

SLJY and QRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLJY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

SLJY vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLJY vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	11.19%	43.38%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	-2.50%	6.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than QRMI's -2.50% return.

SLJY

• 1D: 2.62%
• 1M: -18.20%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 29.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLJY vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLJY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

SLJY

Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF

QRMI

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF

Return for Risk

SLJY vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 21
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLJY vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLJY	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	0.09	+2.13

Correlation

The correlation between SLJY and QRMI is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SLJY vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.71%, less than QRMI's 12.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	11.71%	6.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.66%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Drawdowns

SLJY vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -30.60%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLJY	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.60%	-20.95%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.12%	-3.54%	-15.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-8.25%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLJY	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.14%	7.77%	+43.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.14%	8.46%	+42.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.14%	8.46%	+42.68%