SLJY vs. GDXW
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW).
SLJY and GDXW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLJY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. GDXW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 29, 2025.
Performance
SLJY vs. GDXW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLJY vs. GDXW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 8.36% | 21.58% |
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 5.38% | 21.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than GDXW's 5.38% return.
SLJY
- 1D
- 7.76%
- 1M
- -21.18%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 27.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXW
- 1D
- 8.44%
- 1M
- -25.76%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLJY vs. GDXW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLJY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLJY vs. GDXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLJY | GDXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.07 | 1.29 | +0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLJY and GDXW is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLJY vs. GDXW - Dividend Comparison
SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, less than GDXW's 23.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 12.01% | 6.26% |
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 23.26% | 7.48% |
Drawdowns
SLJY vs. GDXW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -30.60%, smaller than the maximum GDXW drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and GDXW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLJY | GDXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.60% | -36.83% | +6.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.18% | -25.76% | +4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -8.15% | +1.34% |
Volatility
SLJY vs. GDXW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLJY | GDXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.23% | 64.01% | -12.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.23% | 64.01% | -12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.23% | 64.01% | -12.78% |