SLJY vs. SILJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ).

SLJY and SILJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLJY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. SILJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Junior Silver Miners & Explorers Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2012.

Performance

SLJY vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLJY vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	8.36%	43.38%
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF	7.41%	73.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's 7.41% return.

SLJY

• 1D: 7.76%
• 1M: -21.18%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 27.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: 8.82%
• 1M: -26.25%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 31.14%
• 1Y: 149.83%
• 3Y*: 42.89%
• 5Y*: 16.70%
• 10Y*: 14.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLJY vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLJY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

SLJY

Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF

SILJ

ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF

Return for Risk

SLJY vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLJY vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLJY	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.07	0.09	+1.98

Correlation

The correlation between SLJY and SILJ is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SLJY vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than SILJ's 1.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	12.01%	6.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.86%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Drawdowns

SLJY vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -30.60%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLJY	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.60%	-79.04%	+48.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.09%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.18%	-26.25%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.81%	-41.67%	+34.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLJY	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.23%	54.97%	-3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.23%	44.07%	+7.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.23%	46.61%	+4.62%