SLJY vs. BLOK
SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLJY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLJY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
SLJY vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 14.77% return.
SLJY
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- -4.62%
- 6M
- -7.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 14.77%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 48.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SLJY vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | -4.62% | 42.11% |
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 14.77% | -4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLJY and BLOK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLJY vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
SLJY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLOK
SLJY vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLJY | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLJY vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -32.40%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLJY | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.40% | -73.33% | +40.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.62% | -11.27% | -19.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -25.99% | +15.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.48% | — |
Volatility
SLJY vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLJY | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.39% | 39.10% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.39% | 42.53% | +7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.39% | 39.03% | +11.36% |
SLJY vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLJY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLJY vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.88%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 18.88% | 6.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLJY and BLOK have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SLJY.
SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 18.88%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.
SLJY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BLOK is Blockchain. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SLJY and 0.70% for BLOK.
Find the right allocation for SLJY and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer