SLGL vs. CCJ
SLGL (Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. SLGL operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 5 years, SLGL returned -9.84%/yr vs 40.64%/yr for CCJ. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLGL vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLGL achieves a 75.13% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 17.03% return.
SLGL
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- 75.13%
- 6M
- 75.05%
- 1Y
- 922.26%
- 3Y*
- 32.68%
- 5Y*
- -9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CCJ
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 57.14%
- 3Y*
- 53.29%
- 5Y*
- 40.64%
- 10Y*
- 27.01%
SLGL vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. | 75.13% | 353.07% | -15.83% | -75.77% | -38.38% | -24.41% | -42.92% | 184.88% | -60.73% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 17.03% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLGL and CCJ is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
SLGL:
$209.36M
CCJ:
$46.64B
SLGL:
-$0.37
CCJ:
CA$1.49
SLGL:
11.19
CCJ:
18.67
SLGL:
4.07
CCJ:
9.33
SLGL:
$18.47M
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
SLGL:
$18.47M
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
SLGL:
-$2.03M
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLGL vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
SLGL
CCJ
SLGL vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLGL | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.21 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 26.34 | 1.97 | +24.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 60.95 | 4.65 | +56.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLGL vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLGL drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGL and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLGL | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.87% | -87.53% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.38% | -29.13% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.71% | -40.01% | -50.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.24% | -40.01% | -57.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.97% | -20.15% | -36.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -46.06% | -18.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.26% | 12.33% | +2.93% |
Volatility
SLGL vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) has a higher volatility of 19.43% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 18.28%. This indicates that SLGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLGL | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.43% | 18.28% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.28% | 39.80% | +26.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.75% | 55.45% | +45.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.47% | 49.78% | +110.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 132.39% | 46.81% | +85.58% |
Dividends
SLGL vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
SLGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SLGL vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SLGL and CCJ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLGL has higher volatility (19.43%) compared to CCJ (18.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGL dropped -97.87% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
SLGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.27 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLGL and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer