SLGL vs. MU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SLGL (Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. SLGL operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, SLGL returned -9.84%/yr vs 73.49%/yr for MU. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLGL vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLGL achieves a 75.13% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 324.61% return.

SLGL

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: 75.13%
• 6M: 75.05%
• 1Y: 922.26%
• 3Y*: 32.68%
• 5Y*: -9.84%
• 10Y*: —

MU

• 1D: 6.82%
• 1M: 61.30%
• YTD: 324.61%
• 6M: 338.33%
• 1Y: 882.43%
• 3Y*: 165.88%
• 5Y*: 73.49%
• 10Y*: 57.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLGL vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.	75.13%	353.07%	-15.83%	-75.77%	-38.38%	-24.41%	-42.92%	184.88%	-60.73%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	324.61%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-27.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SLGL and MU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018	0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap SLGL : $209.36M MU : $1.38T
EPS SLGL : -$0.37 MU : $21.26
PS Ratio SLGL : 11.19 MU : 23.64
PB Ratio SLGL : 4.07 MU : 19.06
Total Revenue (TTM) SLGL : $18.47M MU : $58.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) SLGL : $18.47M MU : $33.96B
EBITDA (TTM) SLGL : -$2.03M MU : $25.99B

Return for Risk

SLGL vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLGL

SLGL Risk / Return Rank: 99
SLGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SLGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SLGL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
SLGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SLGL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLGL vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLGL	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.27	12.50	-3.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.40	6.48	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.82	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	26.34	29.44	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	60.95	111.67	-50.72

SLGL vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLGL Sharpe Ratio is 9.27, which is comparable to the MU Sharpe Ratio of 12.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLGL and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLGL vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLGL drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGL and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLGL	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.87%	-98.25%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.38%	-30.28%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.71%	-57.63%	-33.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.24%	-57.63%	-39.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.97%	0.00%	-56.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.20%	-58.13%	-6.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.26%	7.97%	+7.29%

Volatility

SLGL vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) is 19.43%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.47%. This indicates that SLGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLGL	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.43%	33.47%	-14.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.28%	58.69%	+7.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.75%	71.47%	+29.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	160.47%	53.67%	+106.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	132.39%	50.30%	+82.09%

Dividends

SLGL vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

SLGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.04%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLGL and MU in my portfolio?

SLGL and MU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLGL or MU?

MU has higher volatility (33.47%) compared to SLGL (19.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGL dropped -97.87% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.50 vs 9.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.