SLGL vs. MU
SLGL (Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. SLGL operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, SLGL returned -6.04%/yr vs 61.18%/yr for MU. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SLGL vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLGL achieves a 95.18% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return.
SLGL
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 28.08%
- YTD
- 95.18%
- 1Y
- 532.69%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- -6.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.07%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -15.62%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 685.99%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B | |
| $4.19M | $3.49M | $2.73M |
SLGL vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. | 95.18% | 353.07% | -15.83% | -75.77% | -38.38% | -24.41% | -42.92% | 184.88% | -60.73% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -27.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLGL and MU is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
SLGL:
$268.87M
MU:
$929.52B
SLGL:
-$0.37
MU:
$44.42
SLGL:
12.49
MU:
10.36
SLGL:
4.54
MU:
9.33
SLGL:
$18.47M
MU:
$90.27B
SLGL:
$18.47M
MU:
$65.51B
SLGL:
-$2.03M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLGL vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
SLGL
MU
SLGL vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLGL | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.63 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.76 | 16.92 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.16 | 64.08 | -30.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLGL vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLGL drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGL and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLGL | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.87% | -98.25% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.38% | -39.10% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.73% | -57.63% | -32.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.60% | -57.63% | -38.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.04% | -32.17% | -19.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.07% | -58.02% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 10.31% | +6.48% |
Volatility
SLGL vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) is 19.77%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that SLGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLGL | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.77% | 31.11% | -11.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.77% | 67.64% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.04% | 81.13% | +18.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.55% | 56.32% | +104.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 131.71% | 51.42% | +80.29% |
Dividends
SLGL vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
SLGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SLGL vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SLGL and MU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to SLGL (19.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGL dropped -97.87% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 5.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLGL and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer