SLB vs. KRT
SLB (Schlumberger Limited) and KRT (Karat Packaging Inc.) are both stocks. SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while KRT operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, SLB returned 12.44%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for KRT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLB vs. KRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a 48.01% return, which is significantly higher than KRT's 37.80% return.
SLB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 48.01%
- 6M
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- -0.34%
KRT
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 37.80%
- 6M
- 35.05%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 27.62%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
SLB vs. KRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 48.01% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 11.06% |
KRT Karat Packaging Inc. | 37.80% | -20.12% | 28.81% | 86.11% | -27.07% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and KRT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
SLB:
$3.04
KRT:
$1.58
SLB:
18.45
KRT:
19.04
SLB:
0.87
KRT:
1.95
SLB:
1.70
KRT:
1.26
SLB:
$35.94B
KRT:
$481.07M
SLB:
$4.90B
KRT:
$172.90M
SLB:
$5.30B
KRT:
$56.33M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLB vs. KRT — Risk / Return Rank
SLB
KRT
SLB vs. KRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLB | KRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.15 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 0.80 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | 1.66 | +9.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLB vs. KRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.64%, which is greater than KRT's maximum drawdown of -48.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and KRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLB | KRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.64% | -48.46% | -39.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -26.80% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.63% | -34.03% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.63% | -48.46% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.53% | -0.45% | -33.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.18% | -18.50% | -12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 12.84% | -7.17% |
Volatility
SLB vs. KRT - Volatility Comparison
Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) have volatilities of 9.50% and 9.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLB | KRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 9.84% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.72% | 28.08% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.73% | 36.86% | -3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.63% | 45.39% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.41% | 45.43% | -5.02% |
Dividends
SLB vs. KRT - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than KRT's 5.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRT Karat Packaging Inc. | 5.99% | 7.98% | 5.12% | 6.24% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.06% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
SLB vs. KRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Karat Packaging Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLB vs. KRT - Profitability Comparison
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.53M and revenue of 116.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
KRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported an operating income of 8.46M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
KRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a net income of 6.74M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLB and KRT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRT has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to SLB (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLB dropped -87.64% vs KRT's -48.46%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLB and KRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer