PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRT vs. NNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRT vs. NNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRT achieves a 28.91% return, which is significantly higher than NNN's 14.17% return.


KRT

1D
5.63%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
28.91%
6M
32.25%
1Y
-1.72%
3Y*
29.61%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*

NNN

1D
-0.48%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
14.17%
6M
11.33%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
4.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRT vs. NNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
28.91%-20.12%28.81%86.11%-27.07%8.89%
NNN
National Retail Properties, Inc.
14.17%2.81%-0.06%-0.60%-0.01%8.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KRT and NNN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2021

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KRT:

$564.47M

NNN:

$8.33B

EPS

KRT:

$1.58

NNN:

$2.05

PE Ratio

KRT:

17.81

NNN:

21.41

PEG Ratio

KRT:

1.83

NNN:

2.43

PS Ratio

KRT:

1.18

NNN:

8.86

PB Ratio

KRT:

3.64

NNN:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRT:

$481.07M

NNN:

$935.78M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRT:

$172.90M

NNN:

$761.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

KRT:

$56.33M

NNN:

$870.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRT vs. NNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRT
KRT Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
KRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NNN
NNN Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRT vs. NNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRTNNNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.14

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

1.42

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

3.28

-3.38

KRT vs. NNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the NNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRT and NNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRTNNNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

0.77

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.17

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.40

-0.09

Drawdowns

KRT vs. NNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRT drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, smaller than the maximum NNN drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRT and NNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRTNNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-56.17%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.57%

-8.83%

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.03%

-22.03%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.46%

-25.22%

-23.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-2.91%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-9.82%

-8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.40%

3.83%

+13.57%

Volatility

KRT vs. NNN - Volatility Comparison

Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) has a higher volatility of 13.51% compared to National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN) at 4.56%. This indicates that KRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRTNNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.51%

4.56%

+8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.29%

11.43%

+16.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.71%

16.32%

+23.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.40%

19.66%

+25.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.53%

28.07%

+17.46%

Dividends

KRT vs. NNN - Dividend Comparison

KRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than NNN's 5.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
6.40%7.98%5.12%6.24%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NNN
National Retail Properties, Inc.
5.46%5.96%5.61%5.17%4.72%4.37%5.06%3.79%4.02%4.31%4.03%4.27%

Financials

KRT vs. NNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Karat Packaging Inc. and National Retail Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
116.95M
240.42M
(KRT) Total Revenue
(NNN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KRT vs. NNN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Karat Packaging Inc. and National Retail Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
35.5%
95.9%
Portfolio components
KRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.53M and revenue of 116.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

NNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 230.63M and revenue of 240.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

KRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported an operating income of 8.46M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

NNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.65M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.

KRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a net income of 6.74M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

NNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 93.95M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in a net margin of 39.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRT and NNN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRT has higher volatility (13.51%) compared to NNN (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRT dropped -48.46% vs NNN's -56.17%.

NNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRT and NNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer