SKYU vs. TERG
SKYU (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SKYU is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SKYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
SKYU vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 225.36% return.
SKYU
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 27.03%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 18.01%
- 1Y
- 41.23%
- 3Y*
- 38.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 23.46%
- YTD
- 225.36%
- 6M
- 202.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKYU vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 20.72% | 1.12% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 225.36% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYU and TERG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYU vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
SKYU
TERG
SKYU vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKYU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKYU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 9.47 | -9.44 |
Drawdowns
SKYU vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -49.52% | -33.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.26% | -17.07% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.16% | -13.75% | -35.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.88% | — | — |
Volatility
SKYU vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.92% | 138.78% | -82.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.88% | 138.78% | -76.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.12% | 138.78% | -77.66% |
SKYU vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKYU vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 0.58% | 0.56% | 0.21% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYU and TERG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKYU.
SKYU has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for SKYU and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer