SKF vs. SQQQ
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SKF tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKF returned -27.76%/yr vs -56.54%/yr for SQQQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SKF vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -27.76%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.54% annualized return.
SKF
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- -6.38%
- 3Y*
- -27.01%
- 5Y*
- -17.29%
- 10Y*
- -27.76%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- -40.98%
- 6M
- -38.01%
- 1Y
- -59.41%
- 3Y*
- -54.63%
- 5Y*
- -47.03%
- 10Y*
- -56.54%
SKF vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.43% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -31.70% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.98% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and SQQQ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SKF and SQQQ has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SKF vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
SQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SKF
SQQQ
Basic Materials
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
SKF
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
SQQQ
SKF vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.79 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | -0.96 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | -1.84 | +1.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -100.00% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.02% | -62.23% | +40.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.09% | -92.51% | +24.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.40% | -97.27% | +24.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.33% | -99.98% | +3.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.95% | -100.00% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.28% | -92.73% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 33.76% | -23.97% |
Volatility
SKF vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) is 8.50%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.22%. This indicates that SKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 26.22% | -17.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.34% | 43.25% | -20.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.98% | 53.47% | -24.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 67.54% | -31.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.81% | 66.45% | -25.64% |
SKF vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SKF and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SKF vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than SQQQ's 10.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.10% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.12% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.22%) compared to SKF (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SKF leads with -27.76% vs -56.54% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SKF has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SKF has performed better with a -27.76% return vs -56.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKF and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.12%, compared with 4.10% for SKF.
SKF tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
SKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer