PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. VSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 9.29% return.


SIXH

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.70%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

VSMV

1D
0.33%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.79%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
7.20%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%5.83%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
9.29%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%16.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and VSMV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.61

The correlation between SIXH and VSMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIXH vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXH
VSMV

Consumer Defensive

23.2%
17.6%

Technology

20.2%
34.4%

Communication Services

13.3%
5.4%

Healthcare

12.6%
14.8%

Financial Services

9.7%
8.1%

Industrials

7.8%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
5.0%

Utilities

5.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.0%

Energy

0.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

SIXH
23.2%
VSMV
17.6%

Technology

SIXH
20.2%
VSMV
34.4%

Communication Services

SIXH
13.3%
VSMV
5.4%

Healthcare

SIXH
12.6%
VSMV
14.8%

Financial Services

SIXH
9.7%
VSMV
8.1%

Industrials

SIXH
7.8%
VSMV
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXH
6.8%
VSMV
5.0%

Utilities

SIXH
5.0%
VSMV
0.0%

Real Estate

SIXH
1.4%
VSMV
0.0%

Energy

SIXH
0.1%
VSMV
4.4%

Basic Materials

SIXH
0.1%
VSMV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXHVSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.49

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

4.74

-2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

18.09

-11.83

SIXH vs. VSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the VSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and VSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXHVSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.71

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.89

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.82

+0.23

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum VSMV drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and VSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHVSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-31.33%

+19.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-5.18%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-13.22%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-17.96%

+6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-0.79%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-3.41%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.36%

+0.34%

Volatility

SIXH vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) have volatilities of 2.31% and 2.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHVSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.41%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

6.34%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.60%

9.08%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

12.86%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.15%

15.04%

-4.89%

SIXH vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than VSMV's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.90%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.31%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and VSMV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSMV has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs VSMV's -31.33%.

On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.35% vs 8.95% for SIXH. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.35% for VSMV.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and VSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer