SIXH vs. URNM
SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) and URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXH is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while URNM is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. SIXH is actively managed, while URNM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXH returned 8.95%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for URNM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXH charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.
Performance
SIXH vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 11.97% return.
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
URNM
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 52.67%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXH vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 7.20% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 5.83% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 11.97% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 54.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXH and URNM is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SIXH and URNM shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIXH vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXH
URNM
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
SIXH
URNM
-
Technology
SIXH
URNM
-
Communication Services
SIXH
URNM
-
Healthcare
SIXH
URNM
-
Financial Services
SIXH
URNM
-
Industrials
SIXH
URNM
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIXH
URNM
-
Utilities
SIXH
URNM
-
Real Estate
SIXH
URNM
-
Energy
SIXH
URNM
Basic Materials
SIXH
URNM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXH vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
SIXH
URNM
SIXH vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXH | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.65 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | 3.59 | +2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXH | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.03 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.32 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.67 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
SIXH vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXH | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -50.78% | +39.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.36% | -32.04% | +27.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | -50.78% | +41.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.68% | -50.78% | +39.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -26.82% | +24.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -18.03% | +16.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 14.71% | -13.01% |
Volatility
SIXH vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.31%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXH | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 16.19% | -13.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.02% | 40.32% | -34.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.60% | 51.69% | -44.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 48.30% | -37.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 46.90% | -36.75% |
SIXH vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXH vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than URNM's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.84% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXH and URNM have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs URNM's -50.78%.
On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 15.58% vs 8.95% for SIXH. On fees, URNM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URNM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.
SIXH is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while URNM is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.85% for URNM.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXH and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer