PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. CEFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 13.75% return.


SIXH

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.70%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

CEFS

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.35%
YTD
13.75%
6M
15.64%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
7.20%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%5.83%
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
13.75%16.67%23.48%20.99%-7.08%17.86%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and CEFS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.30

The correlation between SIXH and CEFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIXH vs. CEFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXH
CEFS

Consumer Defensive

23.2%
1.8%

Technology

20.2%
12.4%

Communication Services

13.3%
4.1%

Healthcare

12.6%
4.6%

Financial Services

9.7%
48.9%

Industrials

7.8%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
3.3%

Utilities

5.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.2%

Energy

0.1%
11.2%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

SIXH
23.2%
CEFS
1.8%

Technology

SIXH
20.2%
CEFS
12.4%

Communication Services

SIXH
13.3%
CEFS
4.1%

Healthcare

SIXH
12.6%
CEFS
4.6%

Financial Services

SIXH
9.7%
CEFS
48.9%

Industrials

SIXH
7.8%
CEFS
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXH
6.8%
CEFS
3.3%

Utilities

SIXH
5.0%
CEFS
4.2%

Real Estate

SIXH
1.4%
CEFS
1.2%

Energy

SIXH
0.1%
CEFS
11.2%

Basic Materials

SIXH
0.1%
CEFS
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CEFS
CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXHCEFSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

4.43

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

17.26

-11.00

SIXH vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and CEFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXHCEFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.53

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.06

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.79

+0.26

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and CEFS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHCEFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-38.99%

+27.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-5.67%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-13.37%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-16.85%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-0.51%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-3.67%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.45%

+0.25%

Volatility

SIXH vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.31%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHCEFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

3.37%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

8.56%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.60%

9.95%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

13.08%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.15%

15.33%

-5.18%

SIXH vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than CEFS's 7.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
7.10%7.84%8.79%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%8.10%10.43%5.02%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.90%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and CEFS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEFS has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs CEFS's -38.99%.

On 5-year performance, CEFS leads with 13.85% vs 8.95% for SIXH. On fees, SIXH is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CEFS has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXH is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for CEFS.

CEFS has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.

SIXH is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while CEFS is Event Driven. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 1.29% for CEFS.

CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and CEFS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer