SIXD vs. ENFR
SIXD (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. SIXD is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. SIXD charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
SIXD vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.
SIXD
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
SIXD vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXD AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF | 5.81% | -0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.93% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXD and ENFR is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXD vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
SIXD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR
SIXD vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXD | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXD vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXD | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -68.28% | +63.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -4.71% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -15.94% | +15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
SIXD vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXD | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 14.86% | -7.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 19.25% | -11.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 24.68% | -17.04% |
SIXD vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXD vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
SIXD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
SIXD AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXD and ENFR have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXD.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for SIXD.
SIXD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.35% for ENFR.
Find the right allocation for SIXD and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer