PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXD vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXD vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return.


SIXD

1D
0.06%
1M
2.71%
YTD
7.20%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
0.76%
1M
-7.65%
YTD
86.76%
6M
83.45%
1Y
89.50%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
23.77%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXD vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXD and BNO is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXD vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXD

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXD vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXD vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXDBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

0.14

+2.15

Drawdowns

SIXD vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXDBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-87.06%

+82.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.04%

+12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-40.18%

+39.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

Volatility

SIXD vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXDBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

41.56%

-34.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

35.37%

-27.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.38%

36.68%

-29.30%

SIXD vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXD vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXD nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXD and BNO have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SIXD is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXD is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

SIXD and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SIXD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.90% for BNO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXD and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer